How proteins drive growth of multiple cancer

 Researchers have conducted an in-depth examination of the proteins responsible for cancer across a variety of tumour types, providing knowledge that cannot be determined only by genome sequencing. The possibility of developing new treatments that inhibit crucial proteins that promote the progression of cancer or that elicit immune responses in response to aberrant proteins produced by cancer cells is increased by a growing understanding of how proteins function in cancer cells.

The Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium studies the major proteins causing cancer and how they're controlled, with leadership provided by Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Brigham Young University, and other schools across the world.

The results were published in the journals Cell and Cancer Cell.

The Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium is funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

“In our efforts to develop better cancer therapies, this new analysis of the proteins driving tumor growth is the next step after cancer genome sequencing,” said senior author Li Ding, PhD, the David English Smith Distinguished Professor of Medicine at Washington University. “Through our past work sequencing the genomes of cancer cells, we identified almost 300 genes driving cancer. Now, we are studying the details of the machinery these cancer genes set in motion — the proteins and their regulatory networks that actually do the work of causing uncontrolled cell division. We are hopeful this analysis will serve as an important resource for cancer researchers seeking to develop new treatments for many tumor types.”

The researchers analyzed about 10,000 proteins involved in 10 different types of cancer. Ding emphasized the importance of the sheer volume of data in this type of analysis; many of these important cancer-driving proteins are rare in any single cancer and could not have been identified had the tumor types been studied individually. The analysis included two different types of lung cancer as well as colorectal, ovarian, kidney, head and neck, uterine, pancreatic, breast and brain cancers.

“Many of these proteins driving cancer are found in multiple tumor types but at low frequency,” said Ding, also a research member of Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine. “When we analyze many cancer types together, we increase the power we have to detect important proteins that are causing the cancer to grow and spread. A combined analysis also allows us to pinpoint the major common mechanisms driving cancers across types.”

Beyond the function of individual proteins, such data also allow the researchers to understand how proteins interact with one another to fuel cancer growth. If the levels of two proteins correlate with one another — for example, when one is present at high levels and the other always is as well — this can indicate that the two proteins act as partners. Disrupting the interaction may be a promising way to block tumor growth.

The studies, including one co-led by Ding and Gad Getz, PhD, of the Broad Institute, also revealed different ways proteins can be chemically altered to change their function. The researchers documented how such chemical changes — processes called acetylation and phosphorylation — can alter DNA repair, change immune responses, and modify how DNA is folded and packaged, among other important molecular changes that can play roles in driving cancer.

The research also shed light on the effectiveness of immunotherapies. Immunotherapies such as checkpoint inhibitors often work best in cancers with a lot of mutations, but even then, they don’t work for all patients. The researchers found that high numbers of mutations don’t always result in an abundance of abnormal proteins, which is what the immune system targets when attacking a tumor.

“For some cancers, even with mutations having the potential to generate tumor antigens, if there is no abnormal protein expressed, or very little, such mutations may not be targetable for treatment,” Ding said. “This could be an explanation for why some patients don’t respond to immunotherapy, even when it seems like they should. As such, our proteomics investigation covering the expression profiles of tumor antigens are particularly useful for designing new immunotherapy targeting selected mutations.”

In another study, Ding’s team identified patterns of DNA methylation, another chemical alteration that can influence the way genes are expressed. Such patterns can be key cancer drivers. In one important finding, the team identified a molecular switch that suppresses the immune system in certain tumor types.

The final paper in the set of four studies makes the data and analysis resources used by the consortium available to the wider research community.

“In general, this thorough proteomic and chemical modification analysis across many cancer types — combined with our longstanding knowledge of cancer genomics — provides another layer of information that we hope can help answer many ongoing questions about how cancer grows and manages to evade many of our best treatments,” she said.